creative, design, business, office, desk, computer, monitor, keyboard, hands, working, gray computer, gray office, gray laptop, gray work, gray desk, gray keyboard, gray creative
Photo by StockSnap on Pixabay

Tools and providers

Part of Which ad approvals software do UK agencies prefer?

Which ad approvals software do UK agencies prefer?

A comparison of Ziflow, Filestage, PageProof, GoVisually and ReviewStudio, judged on client sign-off, ASA compliance and British project tool links.

What to take away

  • Ziflow, Filestage, PageProof, GoVisually and ReviewStudio cover the main proofing options for UK agencies.
  • Bynder and Adobe Workfront suit larger teams that need asset rights and work management, not just comments.
  • Wipster and Frame.io are video-first choices for TV, social and display campaigns.
  • No mainstream tool lists Ayoa, Huddle or Kahootz as a native connector, so check API or Zapier routes.
  • A CAP Code checklist can live in the tool, but a person still decides whether an ad misleads.

The shortlist, judged on client sign-off

Client sign-off

Ziflow (user tiers)
Branded portal, version compare, guest reviewers
Filestage (active projects)
Side-by-side versions, formal approval steps
PageProof (per user)
Review portal, automated reminders, approval stamps
GoVisually (flat plans)
Simple client review, versioning
ReviewStudio (tiered)
Image, document and video proofing
Bynder (quote)
DAM approval workflows, rights and expiry
Adobe Workfront (quote)
Work management plus proofing
Wipster and Frame.io (per user)
Video review with time-coded comments

ASA compliance checks

Ziflow (user tiers)
Custom checklists and audit trail, no ASA ruling
Filestage (active projects)
Review steps and checklists, no claims judgement
PageProof (per user)
Checklist fields and audit trail, no ASA ruling
GoVisually (flat plans)
Comment and approval log, no claims register by default
ReviewStudio (tiered)
Custom fields and audit log, no ASA judgement
Bynder (quote)
Metadata for claims, disclaimers and territories
Adobe Workfront (quote)
Approval workflows and audit trail
Wipster and Frame.io (per user)
Approval status, no claims register

Links to British project management tools

Ziflow (user tiers)
Jira, Asana, Trello, Slack and Teams; no Ayoa or Huddle connector
Filestage (active projects)
Jira, Asana, Trello, Slack and Teams; no Paprika connector
PageProof (per user)
Jira, Asana, Trello, monday.com and Slack; no Glasscubes connector
GoVisually (flat plans)
Zapier and API routes; direct UK tool links are limited
ReviewStudio (tiered)
API and Zapier; check project tool connector
Bynder (quote)
Jira, Workfront and Salesforce; no Ayoa connector
Adobe Workfront (quote)
Jira, Slack and Teams; no Huddle connector
Wipster and Frame.io (per user)
Slack and Adobe tools; no Kahootz connector

If your studio runs on Ayoa, Huddle, Kahootz, Glasscubes or Paprika, check the integration page before buying. Native connectors to those five British project management products are rare. Budget for Zapier, Make or an API build. PageProof and Ziflow both publish API documentation.

Ad approvals software compared

Ziflow

Client sign-off
Branded portal
ASA compliance
Custom checklists
UK tool links
Jira, Asana, Trello

Filestage

Client sign-off
Side-by-side versions
ASA compliance
Review steps
UK tool links
Jira, Asana, Trello

PageProof

Client sign-off
Review portal
ASA compliance
Checklist fields
UK tool links
Jira, Trello, monday

Compliance checks the software cannot make

The CAP Code governs non-broadcast advertising in the UK. The ASA publishes the advertising codes that reviewers work from, and a rulings archive showing where campaigns have failed. Ziflow, Filestage and PageProof can hold a claims checklist and a disclaimer field. They cannot decide whether a price comparison misleads.

Where a tool drafts copy with generative AI, personal data may enter the workflow through a brief or a customer list. The ICO's artificial intelligence guidance covers how to assess that risk.

A lawful basis and a transparency notice are UK GDPR duties, and the retained regulation is the text a vendor should be able to map its processing to.

A structured method for that mapping appears in this walkthrough of how to vet ad creative compliance software before a pilot.

What to test in a two-week pilot

Run Ziflow, Filestage or PageProof on one live campaign with a real client, not on a sample deck. Give the client a seat, then watch whether they use it or reply by email anyway.

Two-week pilot test plan

  • Trace one asset from brief to published ad
  • Export audit log and read as stranger
  • Test project tracker integration with real task
  • Ask vendor who owns approval data
  • Trace one asset from brief to published ad and check the approval record names a person and a date.
  • Export the audit log and read it as a stranger would; if it needs explaining, it will not survive a complaint.
  • Test the integration with your project tracker using a real task, not a demo board.
  • Ask the vendor who owns the approval data and what happens to it when the contract ends.

Where agencies differ by output

Agencies producing display and video need approvals tied to the build, not just to the artwork. A versioning error in an HTML5 banner is easy to approve on a still image and hard to spot in a media report. Teams that build display can compare builders in this HTML5 ad builder comparison before adding an approvals layer.

Video adds a further gate: a rough cut approved for timing is not a finished ad approved for claims. Wipster and Frame.io are built for that review. Bynder and Adobe Workfront are stronger when rights and asset expiry matter.

Common questions

Do UK agencies need dedicated approvals software at all?

Only when the sign-off loop, not the design work, is holding up campaigns. If three reviewers sit in one office and one client signs, comment threads in Figma or Adobe Creative Cloud may be enough. For multi-client work, Ziflow, Filestage and PageProof are common choices.

Can approvals software check ASA compliance automatically?

Ziflow, PageProof and Bynder can store checklist fields, keep a claims register and log who approved what. They cannot judge whether an ad misleads, which stays a human decision against the CAP Code.

What should the approval record contain?

An asset identifier, the version, the date, the named approver, and the answers to the claims and disclaimer checks. Keep it exportable, so it can be handed over without the vendor's help.

Which tools link to Ayoa or Huddle?

No mainstream ad approvals tool lists a native Ayoa or Huddle connector. Use Zapier, Make or the vendor API, and test the handoff. Paprika and Glasscubes users should check for an API before buying.

More in Tools and providers